--- jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If you're going to argue for neutrality, it would
be helpful if you
made more neutral suggestions. The current article name, [[2006
Israel-Lebanon-Hezbollah conflict]], is at least neutral, although it
suffers from being unwieldy and a Wikipedia invention (i.e. original
research).
Hey, dont hide an accusal of bias within a comment that
purports to itself be neutral.
Aside from the fact that the title you give has the glaring issue
of completely bypassing any notions of state sovereignty,
and strangely represents a serious of hostile event as a "conflict,"
I think its perfectly fine.
--- Dabljuh <dabljuh(a)gmx.net> wrote:
Do you consider replacing the title of
"Holocaust"
with "Jewish-Aryan conflict" as neutral as well?
I think this might be a Godwin's Law violation.
-Stevertigo
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com