--- jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
If you're going to argue for neutrality, it would be helpful if you made more neutral suggestions. The current article name, [[2006 Israel-Lebanon-Hezbollah conflict]], is at least neutral, although it suffers from being unwieldy and a Wikipedia invention (i.e. original research).
Hey, dont hide an accusal of bias within a comment that purports to itself be neutral.
Aside from the fact that the title you give has the glaring issue of completely bypassing any notions of state sovereignty, and strangely represents a serious of hostile event as a "conflict," I think its perfectly fine.
--- Dabljuh dabljuh@gmx.net wrote:
Do you consider replacing the title of "Holocaust" with "Jewish-Aryan conflict" as neutral as well?
I think this might be a Godwin's Law violation.
-Stevertigo
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com