Hi, There is of course [[WP:GA]] but it's very painful to nominate an article at the moment - you have to add a template to the article talk page, edit the GA page, potentially edit a template referenced in the GA page, and update the count at the top of GA. Simply to say that IMHO this article is "not bad".
Is there a list of reviewing proposals anywhere? I had a thought for one today whereby any user with at least 100 edits can add a review to any page they have never edited, giving scores out of 5 for comprehensiveness, sourcing, NPOV, and MoS adherence. Not a very thoroughly thought-through thought though...:)
(wow...what a last sentence...it must be late...)
Steve
On 1/31/06, SJ 2.718281828@gmail.com wrote:
Nice is right; I love this discussion. We should start a proper article improvement project, run spot checks like this every few weeks, highlight 'good articles' and not just FAs, have regular ref and stub fixing contests...