eliezer imposes an unfair, seriously biased and inaccurate article dealing with messianic judaism. when i had previously raised my concerns in the discussion page and point out the gross misinformation in the main article, eliezar would delete my comments. (as a side note, i observed others tag this article as violating the npov policy only to have their tags deleted without explanation.)
i wove my editorial comments into the main article and eliezer deleted my comments- saying it belonged on the discussion page (though he had already deleted my comments from the discussion page). i attempted to repost my woven comments on the discussion page and he deleted there again. i attempted to repost my comments woven into the main article to: 1. highlight where the npov policy was violated in several places; 2. show where the facts were seriously inaccurate and, 3. show where the author contradicted himself. eliezer blocked me without sufficient warning per the blocking policy.
while i strongly disagree with eliezer's anti-messianic agenda, i do not feel i vandalized the article or site in any way. this site's policy allows me the freedom to edit articles that violate the npov in a good faith effort to make them more accurate.
i believe eliezer will only force his anti-messianic agenda upon the public and a new administrator needs to be appointed who will fairly address the topic. if no other unbiased third party is willing to take that responsibility, i am willing to volunteer. (just tell me what i need to do to qualify) thank you for your prompt and open-minded attention to this matter.