How about we look at a crap UNdeletion nomination, to show that process is not entirely a fetish of the "deletionists."
[[Gfxvoid]], currently on [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]]. An article about a non-notable forum which fails [[WP:WEB]] guidelines and received a pile of delete votes - a metric crapload of deletion votes, including speedy deletion votes. Not a single keep vote was cast. An admin sensibly speedily deleted the article and closed the debate.
Now here we have it thrown up on Deletion Review for no other reason than "non-notable, spam is not a CSD criterion."
Well, so what?
I think this just even further proves Tony and David's point, that the deletion process is hopelessly overbureaucratized.
-FCYTravis