I'd support changes like that, actually. The problem, as always, is that what's obvious to one person is not always obvious to all. I am concerned, therefore, that people could feel cut off from their ability to participate by one admin's "obvious" decision. Perhaps the solution is to have people say '''Speedy Merge''' or similar, and do so once a few people have agreed to that idea?
SCZenz
On 1/23/06, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/23/06, SCZenz sczenz@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so you're saying that undeletion doesn't need oversight, but crap deletion does? Aren't crap deletions supposed to be shot down by the community just as well-reasoned BOLD undeletions are supported?
I don't have a great overweening analysis of the thing, I just undelete good stuff that gets deleted (and I've had to do too much of that, recently). What I've said on this and other threads is that I agree with the idea of defetishizing the deletion process. I've expressed support for the idea of letting people cut an AfD short by make obvious merges and redirects, for instance. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l