Sean Barrett wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Tony Sidaway stated for the record:
Seth Ravin was deleted a second time eventually. I did a history undelete and started a rewrite that simply changed the subject to TomorrowNow, one of Mr Ravin's more notable companies. I dropped more material than I added but augmented the article with enough references to make sure it makes [[WP:CORP]]. Then I moved the article over the deleted Seth Ravin article, undeleted the history to comply with GFDL, and hey presto, the article we would have had if someone had simply done this in the first place without all the fuss and bother of a deletion nomination, a deletion review and a second deletion nomination.
Yeah, sure, Tony, but you're being very inconsiderate here. Think of all the people who wouldn't have been able to go to sleep with that warm glow of satisfaction that only comes from a day spent deleting other people's work.
Sean Barrett | Anything not worth doing is not worth doing well. sean@epoptic.org | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD1OitMAt1wyd9d+URAifaAJ0aPH/fs528C9FPb14ig5nz61S85ACbBpMn LRfnyzr7JehK0+7zGcyd0HU= =IaIP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This sort of sarcasm isn't very conducive to the tense atmosphere regarding AfD, regardless of how moronic the *fD denizens are. (Full disclosure: Yes, I am the guy who went "to sleep with that warm glow of satisfaction" that came from deleting [[Seth Ravin]]. Seriously. [[TomorrowNow]] is a valid subject; its CEO plainly isn't.)
John Lee ([[User:Johnleemk]])