On 1/22/06, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/23/06, Matt Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
Of those 200 per day, how many /should/ be on afd? As opposed to speedyable or should have been dealt with another way (e.g. merge).
Quite. There are a few unverifiables (real unverifiables, not the nonsense about announcements of licensing deals by two companies being unverifiable) and we could probably find an innovative alternative to AfD for those.
I'm strongly in favor of giving this ago. Many AfD articles are obvious merges or redirects and shouldn't ever see AfD at all.
That reminds me. Why are people allowed to vote Merge or Redirect on AfD in the first place?
-- I'm not stupid, just selectively ignorant.