On 1/21/06, grm_wnr grmwnr@gmail.com wrote:
True; but still we have the two pages. I only said that people should not justify their actions with a reference to a guideline page that doesn't even mention the thing they've been doing, especially since there's another page that does. Or we should just merge the two (yes, I know that won't happen).
Historically both pages express the same sentiment. In recent months it has become popular to cite or attack IAR, but really it can all be boiled down to "it's a wiki".