On 1/21/06, grm_wnr <grmwnr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
True; but still we have the two pages. I only said that people should
not justify their actions with a reference to a guideline page that
doesn't even mention the thing they've been doing, especially since
there's another page that does. Or we should just merge the two (yes, I
know that won't happen).
Historically both pages express the same sentiment. In recent months
it has become popular to cite or attack IAR, but really it can all be
boiled down to "it's a wiki".