On 1/12/06, Brock Batsell wikipedia@theskeptik.com wrote:
On Jan 11, 2006, at 8:39 PM, Garion1000 wrote:
Yes, but someone who puts up an article for AfD thinks the article does not merit inclusion in wikipedia.
Wasn't this discussion aimed at the listings for "bad-quality" articles (i.e., salvageable, but when listed, in bad shape)?
Perhaps, but I don't see many articles being nominated for AfD with the reason that it's a bad quality article. It might well be so. But the reason is usually, hoax, nonsense, or the most popular one "non notable".
Mind you, I don't spend that much time on AfD so I could be missing a lot.
Garion