If it were a one time error in judgement we would have made a very different ruling. You converted the talk page of [[Chip Berlet]] into a sustained personal attack based on guilt by association. You then, during the arbitration converted your user page into the same sort of sustained personal attack based on guilt by association. Then, and now, you continue to maintain you did absolutely nothing wrong. Which means, to me, that we can expect to see more of the same thing the first chance you get.
Fred
On Jan 11, 2006, at 9:27 AM, Rob Smith wrote:
Responding to the bait: My contributions are 99%+ of historic nature. Any Arbitrator (or anyone) who has read Discussion pages I've participated can see for themselves there is an intense focus on the substance of the article, and distinct lack of response to persistent personal attacks. I am a firm believer in civility particularly in controversial discussions. Am I guilty of a breaching experiment, and a one time error in judgement during my first visit to Arbitration? Yes.
nobs