On 1/8/06, Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
So long as their license is compatible with the GFDL (which if they bootstrap from Wikipedia it'll have to be), I see no problems with it. If they produce useful improvements in content quality on some articles that they get reviewed by experts, we can fold in those changes to Wikipedia, too.
I recall hearing they were planning to use a combination of all-rights-reserved full copyright and an as of yet undetermined Creative Commons license (probably one incompatible with the GFDL).