On 1/6/06, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/6/06, Chris Jenkinson chris@starglade.org wrote:
The point of these templates is that they are short and simple to use. If they are subst:'d in, they become more complicated. Why do we need to do this?
Benefit to the servers. Avoidable use of templates should be avoided, and substitution is an easy way of doing that. Creating slightly ugly code is unfortunate but inevitable.
Is there template syntax to force a template to always subst: in? If not, it might be a good idea.
-Matt