Be bold - until somebody raises a meaningful (i.e. non-procedural) objection to your actions, you are entitled to make good faith changes that a reasonably persuasive argument can be made for.
-Phil
On Jan 3, 2006, at 11:54 PM, SCZenz wrote:
I'm not all of Wikipedia, and not everyone agrees with my personal analysis. I don't propose a poll; I do think we need to gague consensus somehow. How about a policy proposal, or a discussion at the village pump?
SCZenz
On 1/3/06, Philip Sandifer snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 2006, at 9:16 PM, SCZenz wrote:
- I've also heard (from Tony, I'm not sure if you've said it), that
many userboxes are being used for inappropriate vote-garnering. If that's true, we can darn well build a consensus to delete them.
You just built it. Right there. You showed how they do not conform to Wikipedia's policy and purpose. Thus, assuming they do exist, they can be deleted freely. Because that's what consensus is - the conclusion of a sensible discussion.
Or do you mean we can hold a stupid poll to delete them?
-Phil _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l