Nick Boalch wrote:
Anthere wrote:
However, current advertisement models show that the best revenues are gathered from targetted advertisement.
To be honest, it's this aspect and its various implications that worries me the most.
Let's say McDonald's pays us $500,000 to put an ad on [[Fast food]]. Is that compliant with [[WP:NPOV]]?
What happens if McDonald's will pay us $500,000 to put an ad on [[Fast food]], but only if we nix the 'Nutritional value' section?
Cheers,
N.
I agree. This is the most worrying situation.
Putting on the ads ONLY in exchange of removing Nutritional Value of the CheeseBurger in the article is a total NONO. It is absolutely not negociable.
Imho, even putting an ad for the CheeseBurger on FastFood would be a very bad idea.
ant