VeryVerily wrote:
Huh? Any idiot can make a thousand uncontroversial
copyedits. What would
you be wrong about in that case?
There _are_ people who, if all they could edit were articles on flowers
and bunnies, would get into an edit war on flowers and bunnies. Now
_you_ may be certain that you're not one of those people, but others may
not know you as intimately as you know yourself.
As you say yourself, proving the fact would take nothing but patience
and self-control. The fact that you took a one-year Wikibreak suggests
you have some of those. So why not go do that? If you start doing it
right now, you'll get quite a few uncontroversial copyedits done even
before this thread here is over.
Besides, those uncontroversial copyedits also improve the encyclopedia.
That's something you seem to care deeply about. We don't want to have
an encyclopedia that's full of misspellings, do we?
--
Ilmari Karonen, not pretending to speak for the ArbCom at all