On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 03:40:53 +1100, you wrote:
My view is
that when they wrote "Wikipedia is not an
indiscriminate collection of information" they had in mind
keeping the focus on what is actually important, rather than
running off after red herrings.
The keyword is "indiscriminate". "Unimportant" is nowhere
merntioned.
Organising small but interesting facts into a trivia section, where there
are enough to warrant doing so, is hardly indiscriminate.
Discrimination has more than one meaning.
"Indiscriminate" and "discrimination" do not carry the same
connotations.
Ec