On 2/23/06, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Woah, a whole _year_? I'd thought the article was just temporarily
deleted while some details got sorted out. _Now_ I've got a serious
grounds for objection. What happens if the deleted article database gets
purged at some point before then? And what if there are notable
developments in the details of this topic over the course of the next
year? We shouldn't have to be keeping notes offline for a whole year,
we'll lose out on all sorts of opportunity for the organic article
growth that Wikipedia excels at.
Hmm... I wonder why do we have articles like [[Alfonso X of Castile]]
that happened 800 years ago??
who kept notes offline so much time?
I wonder if someone did is because he actually is, *ahem* *ahem* notable?