I see a number of serious problems with this approach.
I believe there is a copyright issue since my taking "good edits" and remaking them in your name you are guilty of plagiarism. You are not actually deriving anything as the GFDL allows and you are not correctly attributing as the GFDL requires. Conversely, you are actually deceiving readers about the source of the material and misrepresenting your own authority.
I would assume that if the policy is to role back all edits from a banner editor that the best solution is to apply the policy and expect that independent contributors will take up the slack.
With respect Steven http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:StevenZenith
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:18:53 +0000 From: David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com Subject: [WikiEN-l] Tracking banned user Andrew Morrow To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@wikipedia.org Message-ID: fbad4e140602150918q52c92dafg@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
This fellow was banned as User:Amorrow for vicious personal attacks and threats against other users, and again as User:Pinktulip. His personal attacks have escalated to stalking and threats sent to other editors' employers. Fairly obviously, he's *remarkably* unwelcome on anything to do with Wikipedia.
I'm trying to build up a pattern for a strong complaint, and I'm also rolling back every edit from him I see (making the edit again by hand if it's a good one). If you see any edits fitting the pattern, please email me or leave a note on my talk page.
- d.