Guettarda wrote:
Actually, it wasn't crap. Have a look at the stub that was {{afd}}'d http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cart00ney&oldid=39073156
It's tagged as a stub, it's referenced - it's far from being an FA, but it's nowhere near "crap" (not in a general Wikipedia context)
I don't believe the nominator ever said it was crap. He said it was a non-notable neologism, and thus the _topic_ was not suitable for Wikipedia (the topic was crap, if you like). This is a completely separate issue to the quality of the article's content (which was excellent, probably higher than 99% of the first saved versions of articles).
Cheers! David...