geni wrote:
On 2/10/06, Sean Barrett <sean(a)epoptic.org>
wrote:
Does the burden of defending
information against obliteration fall on me, the contributor?
To a degree. There is a certian minium standard that the article is
expected to meet (ie is expected not to look like a speedy candidate).
Above that the burned heavily falls on anyone trying to delete the
thing
I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that AfD nominators
recognize the names of the longtime active editors, and to guess
that there might be a good reason for the article being in such
a state. I just don't see how someone with all of three weeks of
WP experience is going to have developed a good sense for what
should be in or out.
Stan