-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
geni wrote:
On 2/6/06, Sam Korn <smoddy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/6/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As long as the name is within wikipedia policy
the people involved in
the project can call it what they like.
The difference between "can" and
"should" is not insignificant.
--
Sam
Sure but the name appears to be the one they want so I see no reason
to stop them useing it. As I said no complaints to the helpdesk so
they appear to be doing better than other groups.
It doesn't need to cause specific complaints to engender an atmosphere
of bad faith assumption and a lack of wikilove. Not that the name
necessarily /does/ do that, but...
Yours sincerely,
- --
James D. Forrester
Wikimedia : [[W:en:User:Jdforrester|James F.]]
E-Mail : james(a)jdforrester.org
IM (MSN) : jamesdforrester(a)hotmail.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD57Xtd7WnstdBQBkRAmBdAJ4j31c5epSebU0aGkb8nbh91MxX8wCdGjLU
hXH/tEGQZBq5MaTDLQ3mPDo=
=Ywuy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----