Fastfission wrote:
As for the project itself, I don't see it adding "process"; it seems like a way to centralize certain resources and participation, which I don't think is negative in any way.
I think the CVU is a clear win for Wikipedia and holding back the masses (and I do mean *masses*) of vandalism. Curps in particular has done some amazing work with bot-based detection of vandalism, needed to counter the bot-based vandalism that is fashionable amongst the kiddies these days. You really would not believe the mountains of crap the CVU holds back.
If the name is the real issue, I don't see anything wrong with calling it "WikiProject Counter Vandalism Project", which after all is what it is.
- d.