On 2/1/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, it is described in many places that potentially libellous
material does not belong. But there is a difference between "it
doesn't belong" and "actively look for it and destroy it unless it has
rock solid references".
I thought it didn't need to be described, I assumed it to be
commonsense. But perhaps it does need to be spelled out.
If there is an item of any kind that contains unverified potentially
libellous statements, it's probably best to delete it and put a note
about what you've done on [[WP:AN]]. Someone can look at the history
and see if it contains salvageable early revisions.