On 2/4/06, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/4/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/4/06, The Cunctator
<cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Oh, do explain, please, or point me to a
reference.
Some things are better left alone.
If you're not going to explain, please don't mention it obliquely.
Why is that strange?
Well it isn't consistent with your claims is it.
Ack, you've stripped the context here. Other people have posted in
this thread complaining that every so often people complain about the
CVU. I'm evidently not the first.
> > I have, often.
>
>
> As far as I can tell none of your edits this year are consistent with
> RC patrol or simular.
>
Nope! Try 2001-2002. There's a reason I was put on
the arbcom.
Actually, there are a bunch, mainly because I'm a pain in the ass
about trying to figure out a better way to do things than the status
quo.
Nope! Try reading the "this year" part of the sentence. I highly doubt
vandalfighting 3-4 years ago has much traction compared to the volume and
strategies of vandals today. This is part of the problem, I think. The
method of fighting it is attempting to change, but is being met with
resistance because "We didn't do it that way when we were doing it!"
--
Jay Converse
I'm not stupid, just selectively ignorant.