On 2/3/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/4/06, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe there's a good reason, eh?
Doubtful someone would have said what it was by now.
MfD? WTF? Sheesh. Miscellany for Deletion. What a mess.
Compared to the event that triggered it's creation. Not really.
Oh, do explain, please, or point me to a reference.
Quite possibly.
I'm on the helpdesk mailing list. We get a lot of emails complaining that page x y or z has been vandalised. I'd rather that number didn't increase. These days we have to consider the reader as well as the editor. Strangely we recive few complaints about the actions of the CVU.
Why is that strange?
Good.
Now, if you're able to not take this personally, I would suggest that you try to understand what my criticism is. Working to discourage bad edits needs to be done in a way that creates as little antagonism and "us against them" mentality.
Feel free to do this. Lead by example.
I have, often.