Did blocking not work in this case? Or was it genuinely different
users with different IPs? In that case, there would appear to be no
immediate solution, until we implement some kind of change filtering
for anons. ie: Anon makes a change, non-anon approves the change,
change actually appears. Obviously again a last resort mechanism for
heavily vandalised pages where we really really want to let good faith
anons edit the article (like for FAs).
Steve
On 2/3/06, Keith Old <keithold(a)gmail.com> wrote:
With regards to semi-protection, we need to rethink
our rules about limiting
the semi-protection of feature articles to 15 minutes. The feature article
for Thursday was being vandalised every couple of minutes by a different new
user name but with the same item featuring plenty of pictures of vaginas and
penises.