Did blocking not work in this case? Or was it genuinely different users with different IPs? In that case, there would appear to be no immediate solution, until we implement some kind of change filtering for anons. ie: Anon makes a change, non-anon approves the change, change actually appears. Obviously again a last resort mechanism for heavily vandalised pages where we really really want to let good faith anons edit the article (like for FAs).
Steve
On 2/3/06, Keith Old keithold@gmail.com wrote:
With regards to semi-protection, we need to rethink our rules about limiting the semi-protection of feature articles to 15 minutes. The feature article for Thursday was being vandalised every couple of minutes by a different new user name but with the same item featuring plenty of pictures of vaginas and penises.