Ok, I retract that, was a little overstated. Although I've seen way to many items brought to DRV in the past just to have another go at them (generally in the case of xfd's ended in Keep).
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@wikipedia.org Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 5:52 PM Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] OK, so DRV *is* broken
On 29/12/06, xaosflux xaosflux@gmail.com wrote:
Last I checked, DRV is NOT AFD part2, and should not be involved with content based decisions, just proceedural / consensus measuring ones.
No, that's completely and insanely wrong. It is indeed supposed to review the decision and discussion and content and everything.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l