On 23/12/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
The stub-sorting project turned thousands of unusable entries in [[Category:Stub]] into a usable breakdown of stubs by area.
Would a cite-sorting project for {{fact}} templates be feasible? That way experts in a given subject area will easily be able to look up facts needing a cite and possibly fill them in.
As long as they still display to the reader as [citation needed], and we don't end up with little thumbnails or "biochemical citation needed" in the article text, this sounds fine - just vary the included categories.
Come to think of it, breaking it down by source area might be more useful - {{newspaper cite needed}}; {{journal cite needed}}?