I'd respond to this, as I think this is a very good point, but the
censorists have decided my messages shall all vanish into the ether.
Parker
On 12/13/06, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/13/06, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In the abstract, I agree that we need to find
ways to apply
directional advice to project participants (editors and admins) which
reduces the spectacular flameouts which have become popular of late.
These are not doing anyone, or the project, any good.
We agree.
That said, I think that your idea for how to do
that is
counterproductive and dangerous. This particular aspect of it is, in
my opinion, harmless to moderately beneficial, and a minor symptom.
Okay, I don't see it your way but I respect your position.
I think that, as a result of our environment, far too many people feel
like they are the sole defenders of the Wiki. I think the
impossibility of success as a sole defender is causing people to
exhibit a pattern of volatility and highly emotional responses which
are counter productive, something of a sole defender syndrome.
I think that whatever the causes, we should be desysoping people once
they have become clearly burnt out. We will probably disagree on that,
and thats okay with me. Perhaps we could find more consensus on
approaches to avoiding the burn out before it happens? What could we
change overall to reduce this?
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l