The Cunctator wrote:
On 12/13/06, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/13/06, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at the screenshot and reading GFDL 1.2 it looks like they should just a) have a link on each page to the authors/article history and b) release the code for their modified version of the pages. Not sure how appropriate it is for them to use the logo.
From that page you are two clicks from the history.
The history on our servers. Where's their copy?
Our own information on reuse suggests that a link back is sufficient [1]. Whether that's how the GFDL would be interpreted in court or not I can't say, but it hardly seems like something to fault Google for if they're doing precisely what we ask of them.
-Mark
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights#Example_notice