<snip>
Fair enough. I have no questions on the older blocks. Have been looking into things a bit more. Tariqabjotu has been kind enough to link me to evidence supporting the allegation of block evasion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/RunedChozo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/70.114.237.14
If we compare the two, they look pretty similar, to me.
They don't to me.
70.114.237.14appears to have been used to evade the block on
RunedChozo, as it references the same dispute, uses some of the same language, and shares the same sorts of behavior. It's also worth noting that the vitriol, attacks, and insults coming from 70.114 are far more severe than those from RunedChozo. Looks like block evasion and serious attacks, to me?
Highly unlikely.
JoshuaZ expressed some concern that 70.114 might have been another anon user
who caused problems, in the past. Sounded like he was considering a checkuser request to try and sort out for sure whether they're the same person, but I shouldn't speak for him in that regard.
That looks like a more reasonable assumption.
Also, just as I finished typing this, Tariqabjotu let me know that he's
submitting a checkuser request.
-Luna
If he's vindicated, someone owes him a serious apology and block shortening.
Parker