On 12/12/06, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/12/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
[[Scholars for 9/11 Truth]] is a significant indication of the problem.
What is wrong with that page?
No idea I haven't read it isn't relvivant to my point. My point out there is that there are CTs produceing a large amount of citable material. Most the the active oponents (such as the author of "screw loose change") who are the ones who acutaly write down the point by point debunkings tend not to produce the same amount of citable material.