On 06/12/06, charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
"Sage Ross" wrote
> A little grist for the mill, blog posts by
feminist academics who are
> Wikipedia outsiders or near outsiders:
>http://badgerbag.typepad.com/badgerbag/2006/08/feminist_histor.html
>
http://smg.typepad.com/smg/2006/09/wiki_wiki.html
The second strikes me as more thoughtful. It does
illustrate a few general points (not specific to feminist issues).
The first proposes a very nice idea, a feminism resource wiki. I
provided what I hoped was an encouraging comment. Commenting more now
...
People who scan WP and say 'change that, or that,
or that ...' may never actually get into the pool and edit. The learning curve is
probably much less steep on the non-core articles, rather than articles on the 'major
topics' (I wouldn't advise anyone to start on any of the top few hundred articles
by hits.)
Another thing: this collection of comments does pick up on the spottiness of the
'notability' criteria.
AFD causes public relations problems shock! Ogg Theora at 11.
- d.