What do you care is someone's called a dipstick? We shouldn't be passing value judgments, in the most part.
On 12/5/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:07:47 -0500, "The Cunctator" cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think should be the circumstances under which we link an attack blog from an article on a living individual?
When the attack blog is mentioned in the article.
OK, and in this case it's not. What is mentioned is that some coverage was given in the press to the opposition of Tim Ireland, including his blog. For that, we have a source: the press article; and a link: to Tim Ireland's article. Take three links into the shower? Not me. Especially when one of them calls the subject a "dipstick".
However, I am increasingly of the view that this incident is not really significant. Can anyone list the MPs who have *not* been loudly criticised by at least one constituent?
Guy (JzG)
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l