Guy Chapman writes:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 19:38:27 +0000, David Boothroyd <david at election.demon.co.uk> wrote:
I should like to clarify the issue in this dispute. The question is not whether the blog is a 'source'; it is clearly not a source for anything other than what is said on the blog. The issue is whether or not to mention it in the article
Er, no. The issue is whether to *link* it in the article. That is rather different.
No, not just that. I understand your position to be that the blog is worthy of mention in the text but not worthy of a link. However, there are other actors in this drama, who are the people who wish to have all mention removed. They are the people I was reverting when you blocked me for 3RR.
PS: If you look back to my edit to [[Anne Milton]] on 5 October, and compare it with how the article stood immediately before Twobells' contribution, where does that leave your still unproven theory that the reason I want the blog mentioned is that I have a political animus against Anne Milton? The relevant diff is http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anne_Milton&diff=79621472&...