Then both licenses should apply. But this is pretty clearly a derivative, not aggregate work.
On 12/1/06, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 12/1/06, the wub thewub.wiki@googlemail.com wrote:
Much as I hate meaningless fuss over copyright, aren't these comics incorrectly licensed? The text is directly taken from Wikipedia articles
presumably under the GFDL. But the images are licensed as CC-BY-SA, with
no
reference to either the GFDL or fair use.
That aside, they are quite brilliant.
the wub
Presumably text and images under different licenses can be combined to form an aggregate work. Wikipedia articles do this all the time.
Anthony _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l