On 12/2/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
I never particularly objected to the article's existence and voted "keep" each time it came up, particularly as there were quite a few people keeping an eye on it.
So the "verifiability" problem is not so much about the article's existence, but rather, all the unverifiable material that migrates towards it. Wouldn't a protected two-sentence stub be the way to go? Or, hell, even one sentence...
If you look at any other encyclopaedia, they're full of "stubs" - very short articles that give a bare minimum of information, for less important subjects. We should have no shame in having these.
Steve