On 29/08/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/29/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> See, this is what I meant when I said that
wikilawyering
> "wikilawyering" was not Wikipedia's Godel number and would not cause
> Wikipedia to contradict itself, Mediawiki to output "DOES NOT
> COMPUTE", the server network to explode and the smoking remains to
> finally be scraped into a small dustpan and sold off to Britannica.
Fortunetly not since Wikipedia:WikiLawyering appears
to have been
writen so it can be abused by rule lawyers.
So? It's what we call a "wiki". You know what to do.
- d.