Sarah <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/25/06, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Yes, because people who revert war out citations in violation of NPOV
> on their pet
subjects[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_anti-Semitism&di…
> are exactly the sort of people we want on an editoral board. :-/
Greg, that isn't fair. That was done within a
context of a very
difficult editing situation on that page, with troublemakers turning
up to cause all kinds of problems. We've got a couple of them on the
page at the moment actually trying to change quotations.
I intend to wait until the page has quietened down and
then I'm going
to write a caption that fully reflects the debate and what the sources
say, but there's just no point at the moment.
No point to write or keep an accurate caption, but point enough to revert over and over
again, so much so as to cause 3RR violations? If there's no point, why bother
reverting?
It also seems that the article title has a very definite spin to it that would be better
captured under Hezbollah or a Pro-Lebanon article considering that the opposition of the
"New" is not just Israel.
~~Pro-Lick
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick
http://www.wikiality.net/index.php?title=User:Pro-Lick
--spam may follow--
---------------------------------
All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.