On 8/25/06, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
I was about to suggest that anons be allowed to
create redirects, but
there would be the obvious loophole that they could edit it
afterwards. Then again, editing a redirect is pretty much creating a
new article, so maybe that should be banned anyway for anons.
Why should even _more_ activities be banned when we haven't even seen an
analysis of the results of the _previous_ set of activities that were
banned?
Ok, I wasn't very explicit, I was actually suggesting making it
possible for anons to create redirects, on the creation that they
can't then edit them again.
Steve