On 26/08/06, Stephen Streater <sbstreater(a)mac.com> wrote:
Of course, any system can make it hard to introduce
revolutionary ideas.
All the experts will share the same view, and have made their living
and reputation supporting this view. They are unlikely to admit their
life's work was based on fallacy, perpetuating the misconceptions.
Sucks to be a tertiary source then.
Admittedly most revolutionary ideas are cranky, but
most valuable
innovations are revolutionary. It's a balance between ability to fix
things and inertia.
I think NPOV is pretty innovative.
- d.