On 25/08/06, Cheney Shill <halliburton_shill(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
The thing that always strikes me now when I read the
Encyclopaedia
Britannica is how POV it is, and I often wonder why we're aiming to be
as good as them, when in fact (at our best) we can be so much better.
They have *consistent* quality. At our best we're fantastic, at our
average we're probably better than nothing ...
- d.