On 25/08/06, Cheney Shill halliburton_shill@yahoo.com wrote:
The thing that always strikes me now when I read the Encyclopaedia Britannica is how POV it is, and I often wonder why we're aiming to be as good as them, when in fact (at our best) we can be so much better.
They have *consistent* quality. At our best we're fantastic, at our average we're probably better than nothing ...
- d.