On 8/24/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Because of
this, it is sound policy to warn on the first incident rather than
block.
Unless there is an evident pattern in the editor's behaviour, the only
way to resolve the problem is to fix the error, and go on with life.
Warning a person for making an obvious typo, and blocking him if he
makes a second typo strikes me as an extremist attitude.
I hope I'm misunderstanding you. If someone is editing a paragraph
and changes the year 105 to [[1050]] you think it would be inapproiate
to warn them to execute more care?