Steve Bennett wrote:
I find this statement "it is also one of the world's leading repositories of comical misinformation and nonsense." very misleading and basically incorrect. I'd accept "It is also *potentially* one of..." You feel like asking a journalist to start pressing "random article" and to stop when he's found 3 blatant, ridiculous mistakes of the type mentioned in this article...
Maybe we need to come up with an analogy to describe these errors. Maybe something like cars on a freeway, which the vast majority of the time works well. There are occasional breakdowns, but they don't matter much, and get fixed pretty quickly. And just occasionally there's a big wreck that lasts a few hours. That kind of thing...
As long as the press maintains its compulsion to apologize for looking at us we can only bask in the publicity. What more can we ask of them then that they get the url right? :-)
Ec