On 8/21/06, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/21/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There are few dissputes over consensus these days
because generaly it
is defined. Or do you want to see what would happen if a buracrat
passed an admin at 69% or failed them at 81%?
Dammit, it's not a vote. Or if it is, let's call it that. I would be
perfectly happy to see someone with 90% fail it was 9 pokemon newbies
in favour and Jimbo Wales against. Similarly in the reverse case.
Doesn't seem to happen on WP:RFA so nothinbg something we need concern
ourselves with in this case
And if you don't like the decision made by the
discussion closer,
there should be a mechanism to reopen the discussion. Administrator
discretion zones my arse, if there is genuine dissent with the
outcome, then it should be discussed until an agreement is reached.
Steve
First I'm being told that long running debate is a bad idea and now
I'm being told we should keep reopening discussions. It would appear
there is a lack of consensus on this issue (which is just the way I
like it but no matter).
--
geni