On 8/21/06, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
The classic one I see again and again is people trying to put numbers on "consensus". I recently noticed that at FPC, "Consensus in Featured picture candidates is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support." WTF? I mean, really, "what the fuck?" Anyone incapable of determining genuine consensus should *not* be given a crutch to lean on. Any decision that can only be justified on the basis of a numerical count is not a good decision...
Steve
Who in this case are you asking to do the "determining genuine consensus"?
Why should I accept their resoning over that of someone else? You see the problem.