On 8/21/06, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Coming from a non-chalant user point of view though, they do not
realise that they can track back through the history of the page to
verify things themselves. The quality control you speak of is not
perfect, the author of the article was not attempting to say there was
no control, just that the control is susceptible to failure due to its
passive nature.
I seem to remember this person literally writing there was no quality
control.