On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 20:24:20 +0100
"David Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Bollocks it does. This fallacious view seems to be
held by many on AFD
- where saying someone's deletion nomination was completely
wrongheaded, misguided and stupid will get some idiot claiming that
you have "assumed bad faith" of the nominator. No, I've assumed bad
*judgement*, with the nomination as the evidence.
- d.
Of course you are right - you don't "assume bad faith" by calling
someone's misguided, wrongheaded and stupid action such. That's
a matter of subjective perception (as you call it, evidence).
It is however WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA that prevent you from calling it so.
Hint: You can always call someone a troll. It looks like that's
not a personal attack or anything incivil, but a constructive
criticism of someone's editing habit.