--- Steve Summit <scs(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
To exhaustively, regimentedly cite every
well-known fact in every
article would be ugly, unwieldy, and overbearing. But it's equally
obvious that, the bigger and more popular Wikipedia gets, the harder
it is to rely on "obvious" or "ought to" rules which depend on people
being
reasonable.
So are you saying AGF (a subpolicy of CIVIL, (predecessor too, actually)) is out the
window too?
Assuming good faith does not go so far as to say that we assume
perfection of edits. As long as the person is civil and not abusive of
the editor who put in the unverified statement it should fit within
all the policies.
Peter Ansell