On 8/13/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No, that's not what 'verifiable' means.
It's like deleting a book
reference from an article because it's out of print and your own
library doesn't happen to have it.
I see your point, but are movies not available to the public in that
way available at all?
As long as the reference CAN be verified, I guess, it's good enough.
On the other hand, I have a problem with references theoretically
checkable yet in practice not. I guess this only comes up if a
reference is put into serious question and nobody can verify it.
-Matt